|
Outside of BAMPFA |
Hippie
Modernism at the UC Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archival (BAMPFA)
showcased a variety of artists that represented hippie counterculture and the
historical events that occurred globally during the 60’s and 70’s. Hippies were members
of liberal counterculture that advocated ideas such as a close relationship
with nature, spirit, communal living, artistic experimentation, and
recreational drugs. They were advocates for the environment and peacefully
protested for equal rights during the fight for Civil Rights and for peace
during the Vietnam War. Their counterculture aesthetic rarely has this kind of
attention in history or even a gallery showcasing their contribution to their
culture.
|
Lower floor of the gallery |
On April 22
nd,
the museum was free. Protestors marched the streets outside and people of all
ages were walking around the neighborhood. For a busy Saturday evening, BAMPFA
was not as crowded as expected. Overall the gallery was spacious. It was almost
like a maze the way the different sections of the gallery space were broken up,
especially on the lower floor with the split-level area that opens into another
room. The show was split onto two levels because of the amount of work. There
were two larger installations that people could go inside of. Those were placed
into the center of the rooms, which utilized the large rooms well because a lot
of the work were screen-printed posters and photographs that were hung on the
walls alongside video and performance art displayed on flat screen TVs.
|
Corita Kent's silkscreen posters |
The colorful array of psychedelic
colors signature to the hippie aesthetic were utilized in a variety of forms in
photography, print, sculpture, and installation. The signature poster style of
Hippie culture was demonstrated by Corita Kent in her silkscreen anti-war
posters that utilized text as well as incredibly vibrant neon colors next to
more neutral yet still saturated colors.
|
USCO's two pieces with guard trying to sneak away |
The installations were very
engaging and immersive. However, some installations were weaker because of how
intense the lighting is in the gallery. The flashing lights in USCO’s
installations may have had a more powerful effect if it were in a room with
dimmer lighting.
Shiva (1965) was a massive painting with electric lights around the
perimeter that would blink in a timely manner however, the red lights could
only be seen if paying attention up close. When further away, the gallery
lights wash out the red bulbs. Drop City’s
The
Ultimate Painting (1968/2011) digital print with strobe lights and a motor
did not have that same problem because it was encapsulated in their dome titled
8-Fold “Polar Zonohedron” (1966/2011) made of painted wood, mylar, and composite
panels.
No comments:
Post a Comment